No Big Deal
Moderator: Moderators
- cryoscum
- STOP... Hammer Time The Prodigy
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: QLD, NSW & VIC
No Big Deal
Hi All
After the recent trip to the US I thought I had better come up with a nice performing rocket that is easier to travel with, i.e. make sure all parts are shorter than 1m and can break down to low diameters, including being able to disassemble the fincan. You'll notice from the design that it builds on the work of Mike P, Scoop and Rocketstar - credit where it is due!
So it's a relatively small vehicle that would be able to fly on many different motors, but is intended for a 6G 75mm M.
The single break occurs at the top of the motor (using an aluminium coupler that clamps to the top of the motor case), so the NC and the section of BT is to be made monolithically. Strangely enough, the sims indicate for this design that a 7:1 ogive performs better than a VK. I'm OK with that, happy to make something other than a VK for once!
Started with the NC design:
Then cut the profile box parts, assemble and hotwire the EPS plug:
I did the layup with 10 layers of 165GSM 2x2 twill S-glass and K3600 making a wall thickness of approx 2.2mm and heat treated the monolithic NC/BT overnight with the prescribed ramped method with an apex of 80 deg C.
Made the 5000-series alu NC tip on the lathe in a shape that completes the 7:1 ogive profile. According to the sims I'll need approx 200g of nose ballast to ensure stability throughout the burn and the tip weighs approx 190g. The piece of threaded rod for attachment would provide the rest.
So the alu coupler is next. The design is easy, but my lathe is not big enough for it, so I'll have to get some help for that...
Will keep you posted on progress...
After the recent trip to the US I thought I had better come up with a nice performing rocket that is easier to travel with, i.e. make sure all parts are shorter than 1m and can break down to low diameters, including being able to disassemble the fincan. You'll notice from the design that it builds on the work of Mike P, Scoop and Rocketstar - credit where it is due!
So it's a relatively small vehicle that would be able to fly on many different motors, but is intended for a 6G 75mm M.
The single break occurs at the top of the motor (using an aluminium coupler that clamps to the top of the motor case), so the NC and the section of BT is to be made monolithically. Strangely enough, the sims indicate for this design that a 7:1 ogive performs better than a VK. I'm OK with that, happy to make something other than a VK for once!
Started with the NC design:
Then cut the profile box parts, assemble and hotwire the EPS plug:
I did the layup with 10 layers of 165GSM 2x2 twill S-glass and K3600 making a wall thickness of approx 2.2mm and heat treated the monolithic NC/BT overnight with the prescribed ramped method with an apex of 80 deg C.
Made the 5000-series alu NC tip on the lathe in a shape that completes the 7:1 ogive profile. According to the sims I'll need approx 200g of nose ballast to ensure stability throughout the burn and the tip weighs approx 190g. The piece of threaded rod for attachment would provide the rest.
So the alu coupler is next. The design is easy, but my lathe is not big enough for it, so I'll have to get some help for that...
Will keep you posted on progress...
AMRS L3 | NAR L3 | QRS 089 | MDRA 224
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
- ROCKet STAR
- Astronaut
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
- Contact:
Re: No Big Deal
Looks great, Nic!
I really like the monolithic NC/BT design. Should both improve strength, reduce weight and increase aerodynamic performance. Very interested to see how it all works out.
If I can make a 3" aluminium coupler on my pipsqueek little lathe, I reckon you should be able to make this on yours!
I really like the monolithic NC/BT design. Should both improve strength, reduce weight and increase aerodynamic performance. Very interested to see how it all works out.
cryoscum wrote:So the alu coupler is next. The design is easy, but my lathe is not big enough for it, so I'll have to get some help for that...
If I can make a 3" aluminium coupler on my pipsqueek little lathe, I reckon you should be able to make this on yours!

Chris Barnes
AMRS# 29 - L3
UKRA - L3
AMRS# 29 - L3
UKRA - L3
- cryoscum
- STOP... Hammer Time The Prodigy
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: QLD, NSW & VIC
Re: No Big Deal
ROCKet STAR wrote:If I can make a 3" aluminium coupler on my pipsqueek little lathe, I reckon you should be able to make this on yours!
I had a good look at it. It's really close, but the lathe just doesn't have the x-axis travel to do it comfortably. The inner face cutting is a whole extra level of complexity, so I reckon it's just better to get some help on this one. A bigger lathe would be nice, but I'm already struggling with space in the shed.
AMRS L3 | NAR L3 | QRS 089 | MDRA 224
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
- SpaceManMat
- Astronaut
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:56 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: No Big Deal
The advantage of having a metal nose cone tip is you can use it as a mounting point during storage without worrying about your paint - nice 

-
- Rocket Flyer
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:59 pm
- Location: Berowra Heights, Northern Sydney
Re: No Big Deal
Another one...
Seriously though, good work so far and I really like the concept.
I'm Assuming that the NC tip was made from aluminium, but was it? I don't know why, but to me it seems like an object that size would weigh less if made from Al.
Can't wait to see how it looks finished.
Campbell
Seriously though, good work so far and I really like the concept.

I'm Assuming that the NC tip was made from aluminium, but was it? I don't know why, but to me it seems like an object that size would weigh less if made from Al.
Can't wait to see how it looks finished.
Campbell
MPR cert: Grey Dot on an F52-8T
Level 1 cert: Ok... so maybe I was a little optimistic putting this in. But if I do do it, then it'll be something fast.
Level 1 cert: Ok... so maybe I was a little optimistic putting this in. But if I do do it, then it'll be something fast.
Re: No Big Deal
This coupler is a great job for my newly running NC lathe
I'll post pics of it as I make it in the near future.
CS

I'll post pics of it as I make it in the near future.
CS
Re: No Big Deal
cryoscum wrote:Made the 5000-series alu NC tip on the lathe in a shape that completes the 7:1 ogive profile.
Hey Nic, looks great as always, a newbie question, what was the reason you went with the "5000" series alu (what variant did you go with) as opposed to the normal 6061. Just asking to increase my knowledge of the hobby.
Thanking you in advance...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_alloy
"In thrust we trust"
AMRS 21 L3 RSO
TRA 07459 L3
Impulse:
2020: 00,000 Ns (0% Z)
Ns 19: 14,725; 18: 14,767; 17: 5,973; 16: 34,558; 15: 35,955; 14: 6,016; 13: 10,208
PB - Gorilla N2717WC, H: 10,260', S: M1.14
AMRS 21 L3 RSO
TRA 07459 L3
Impulse:
2020: 00,000 Ns (0% Z)
Ns 19: 14,725; 18: 14,767; 17: 5,973; 16: 34,558; 15: 35,955; 14: 6,016; 13: 10,208
PB - Gorilla N2717WC, H: 10,260', S: M1.14
-
- Rocket Flyer
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:59 pm
- Location: Berowra Heights, Northern Sydney
Re: No Big Deal

(thanks for saving me more embarrassment than necessary CATO)
MPR cert: Grey Dot on an F52-8T
Level 1 cert: Ok... so maybe I was a little optimistic putting this in. But if I do do it, then it'll be something fast.
Level 1 cert: Ok... so maybe I was a little optimistic putting this in. But if I do do it, then it'll be something fast.
- cryoscum
- STOP... Hammer Time The Prodigy
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: QLD, NSW & VIC
Re: No Big Deal
There's not too much to the choice of alloy.
I believe it is 6060-T5 bar stock as this is a simple, cheap and available alloy here. I usually buy off-cuts and it's not always entirely clear exactly what alloy you get, but the machinability gives you a good idea. The places I frequent don't often have 6061 in many different tempers, usually just T6 if at all, making it a bit more resistant to machining. I think 6061-T6 has a tensile strength of something like 250 or 300MPa, i.e. approaching that of mild steel, where as anealled 6060 is maybe 90 or 100MPa. Obviously easier to machine... In this case the ultimate tensile strength of the tip makes no difference.
For something like fins I think you'll have to be a bit more careful, but using the excellent 7075, which has a higher tensile strength than high-end structural steels, costs big $$$ and hence a 6061-T6 would likely be ideal. The short lived aerodynamic heating is unlikely to make much of a difference to the temper...
I believe it is 6060-T5 bar stock as this is a simple, cheap and available alloy here. I usually buy off-cuts and it's not always entirely clear exactly what alloy you get, but the machinability gives you a good idea. The places I frequent don't often have 6061 in many different tempers, usually just T6 if at all, making it a bit more resistant to machining. I think 6061-T6 has a tensile strength of something like 250 or 300MPa, i.e. approaching that of mild steel, where as anealled 6060 is maybe 90 or 100MPa. Obviously easier to machine... In this case the ultimate tensile strength of the tip makes no difference.
For something like fins I think you'll have to be a bit more careful, but using the excellent 7075, which has a higher tensile strength than high-end structural steels, costs big $$$ and hence a 6061-T6 would likely be ideal. The short lived aerodynamic heating is unlikely to make much of a difference to the temper...
AMRS L3 | NAR L3 | QRS 089 | MDRA 224
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
Re: No Big Deal
Cheers Nic,
So, when are you applying to be a TAP....
So, when are you applying to be a TAP....

"In thrust we trust"
AMRS 21 L3 RSO
TRA 07459 L3
Impulse:
2020: 00,000 Ns (0% Z)
Ns 19: 14,725; 18: 14,767; 17: 5,973; 16: 34,558; 15: 35,955; 14: 6,016; 13: 10,208
PB - Gorilla N2717WC, H: 10,260', S: M1.14
AMRS 21 L3 RSO
TRA 07459 L3
Impulse:
2020: 00,000 Ns (0% Z)
Ns 19: 14,725; 18: 14,767; 17: 5,973; 16: 34,558; 15: 35,955; 14: 6,016; 13: 10,208
PB - Gorilla N2717WC, H: 10,260', S: M1.14
-
- Engineer
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Melbourne Australia
- Contact:
Re: No Big Deal
With regards to machining Al-Alloys - there's a simple rule: harder = better. What's more, the same rule also applies to the tensile strength of Al-Alloys ie. harder=stronger so the mathematicians here may therefor equate that better machining = higher spec Al-Alloy and that's pretty much universally true.
Soft Al-Alloys are not only gummy to machine, but they can also blunt tool bits and should be avoided if possible for turning.
TP
Soft Al-Alloys are not only gummy to machine, but they can also blunt tool bits and should be avoided if possible for turning.
TP
ERG #02
- cryoscum
- STOP... Hammer Time The Prodigy
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: QLD, NSW & VIC
Re: No Big Deal
May be so. My small lathe doesn't like stuff that is too hard, vibration issues become really problematic. I get better results with the softer stuff...
AMRS L3 | NAR L3 | QRS 089 | MDRA 224
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
AMRS Technical Advisory Group
Total impulse for 2016: 32,458 Ns (thus far)
Total impulse for 2015: 84,231 Ns
Total impulse for 2014: 40,757 Ns
Total impulse for 2013: 62,927 Ns
- ROCKet STAR
- Astronaut
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
- Contact:
Re: No Big Deal
rocket_troy wrote:With regards to machining Al-Alloys - there's a simple rule: harder = better. What's more, the same rule also applies to the tensile strength of Al-Alloys ie. harder=stronger so the mathematicians here may therefor equate that better machining = higher spec Al-Alloy and that's pretty much universally true.
Soft Al-Alloys are not only gummy to machine, but they can also blunt tool bits and should be avoided if possible for turning.
TP
On a related note, what method does everyone use for cutting down their aluminium barstock? I have always just used a hacksaw, but the diameter of materials that I am using now is making that a fairly miserable experience. I am thinking of investing in a horizontal band saw... something like this: http://www.machineryhouse.com.au/B009 Do you guys reckon that is the best option?
Chris Barnes
AMRS# 29 - L3
UKRA - L3
AMRS# 29 - L3
UKRA - L3
-
- Engineer
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Melbourne Australia
- Contact:
Re: No Big Deal
ROCKet STAR wrote:On a related note, what method does everyone use for cutting down their aluminium barstock? I have always just used a hacksaw, but the diameter of materials that I am using now is making that a fairly miserable experience. I am thinking of investing in a horizontal band saw... something like this: http://www.machineryhouse.com.au/B009 Do you guys reckon that is the best option?
Definitely! We have 3 bandsaws here up to 12" capability and they're the most used bits of kit in the fab area. I do all my cutting on the bandsaw unless I'm at the lab where there isn't one (and that's often a PITA!).
I would recommend one with coolant and as preference, but even without, it's an investment you'll never regret!
TP
ERG #02
Re: No Big Deal
Definitely get the horizontal bandsaw !
I have an old clapped out one but it still is awesome.
Mill or Lathe squares up any wonkiness of the cut.
CS
I have an old clapped out one but it still is awesome.
Mill or Lathe squares up any wonkiness of the cut.
CS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests