Fins - Katana 4

Discussions on mid/high powered model rockets using F powered motors and above.

Moderator: Moderators

joeman
Rocket Flyer
Rocket Flyer
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:05 am

Fins - Katana 4

Postby joeman » Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:04 pm

Hi,
I've been putting a lot of thought into Fin Profiles and the shape they should be.

In terms of priorities:-
* Getting to MACH speed is not a priority.
* Height/altitude is greater priority.

So reduced speed leads to reduced drag. [Sure if I put a motor in it and it gets to Mach 1 nearer to the end of the powered flight. Ok. But I get the impression the drag will go up at that part of the flight resulting in poor performance there. (Can't have it both ways)]

So based on this, I'm going :-
- Round the Leading edge
- Make a 'v' edge on Trailing edge.

Now the rocket I am building is a Katana 4. And is actually comprised of 3 x 2 = 6 fins...2 for every 120degrees.

I'm curious as to what the is for. Is it for looks ? Or does it actually lead to less drag? Perhaps? I assume it has no bearing on my decision to round leading and 'V' the Trailing.
Actually, I should do a simulation of one 'equivalent' fin perhaps instead of two...though I'm not sure if OpenRocket would be able to work at that 'level'.

mmm another thought is, perhaps I should get rocksim instead...apparently this is better for simulating flights..

Thoughts?

Cheers!

Joe
L1 - Callisto (H133) - 11-Jan-2016

User avatar
OverTheTop
It's only money...
It's only money...
Posts: 2356
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Fins - Katana 4

Postby OverTheTop » Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:22 pm

Split-fin designs are usually just for good looks. They do take a bit more work when making the fincan, and aerodynamically they are a little more drag.

Open Rocket or RockSim should both do a reasonable job of simulating the flight. I use RS and it is usually quite close for my Velociraptor which has split fins, without having to do much fine-tuning of the sim file.

Looks like it will take a good selection of motors. You can even adapt down to 54mm motors if you want.

Have fun :)
TRA #13430
L3
"Everybody's simulation model is guilty until proven innocent" (Thomas H. Lawrence 1994)

User avatar
SpaceManMat
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 1767
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:56 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fins - Katana 4

Postby SpaceManMat » Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:36 pm

If you are interested in the effects of fin profiles the take a look at RasAreo II. It's free and has quite a bit more options such as angles.

Normally I stick with OpenRocket. RockSim has some additional options for building some of the more complex designs that you might see in low / mid rockets - think pods and the like although OR is catching up in this regard. RasAero II as mentioned before has better estimates on drag prediction, I use this for faster/higher flights along with OR.
QRS: 124
AMRS: 32 L2 RSO
Highest Altitude: 10,849 feet
Largest Motor: CTI 1115J530 IM
Current Project: X Wing

joeman
Rocket Flyer
Rocket Flyer
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:05 am

Re: Fins - Katana 4

Postby joeman » Thu Jun 29, 2017 6:16 pm

G'day Guys,
RasAero II does sound very interesting.

Thanks for the info and suggestions!

Cheers

Joe
L1 - Callisto (H133) - 11-Jan-2016

joeman
Rocket Flyer
Rocket Flyer
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:05 am

Re: Fins - Katana 4

Postby joeman » Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:11 pm

Only just started gluing fins...taking it slowly and carefully.

Just realised the split fins just make the internal Filleting just a little more difficult. Think I'm going to have to 'bog' up gap between them with 105/206/403 before doing internal fillets.
L1 - Callisto (H133) - 11-Jan-2016


Return to “Mid/High Powered Rocketry”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest